Strategic Direction for Innovation in Intimate Grooming

A Procter & Gamble partner-studio uncovering product opportunities in an oversaturated category

My Role:

Lead Researcher
Design Strategist
Narrative Architect



Northwestern Engineering Design Innovation
Product Design
Fall 2025

SUMMARY

In categories defined by long-held routines, meaningful innovation must remove friction so convincingly that adopting a new habit or product feels safer and easier than staying with the old.

The brief: Find opportunities for innovation in the intimate grooming space.


The tension: Users stick with familiar shaving habits even when those habits create friction, frustration, and unnecessary cognitive load.


The direction: Reduce mental effort and create radical trust in a tool during a sensitive, repeated routine rather than merely improving performance.

PROJECT ARC

RESEARCH PROCESS

Approach


  • 3 rounds of research (home interviews and central site research)

  • 8 participants across diverse life contexts

  • Secondary research to frame existing market

  • Iterative synthesis of ideas between rounds

Purpose


  • Understand consumer behaviors and unmet needs

  • Identify emotional and functional motivations

  • Ground opportunities in real, contextualized user experiences

  • Rapport-building over time

In-home interviews


  • Saw real rituals, tools, environments, constraints

  • Observed natural workarounds and adaptations

  • Identified emotional cues impossible to surface in staged settings


We learned…


  • Long-standing routines persist even when they create frustration

  • Risk avoidance and habit inertia define adoption thresholds

  • Building trust creates space for candor

the hidden half of the user interview

Central-site visit interviews


  • Consumers traveled to our location to test prototypes in a controlled environment

  • Tested expectations, interactions, and assumptions around form and function

  • Explored desirability, ergonomics, perceived confidence


We learned…


  • Users often "told" prototypes what they wanted them to be; misinterpretation revealed meaningful form-language cues

  • Desirability hinged on emotional reassurance as much as functional capability

  • Clarity on interaction directly reduced cognitive load

simulated shopping task to evaluate desirability and novelty across early product renders

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

Approach


  • Integrate consumer insights, form studies, and rapid prototyping to converge on strongest value proposition

Purpose


  • De-risk the innovation pathway and deliver a concept direction that supports long-term growth and integration with P&G business ecosystem

Concept Exploration


  • Translated insights and HMWs into focused opportunity areas 

  • Built low-fidelity prototypes to validate comfort and ergonomics

  • Prioritized concepts using feasibility, differentiation potential, and behavioral adoption thresholds


We learned…


  • Integrating familiar material and aesthetic cues used in current market products supported trust in innovative forms and new mechanisms

exploring interaction through everyday objects to understand natural grip preferences and cues

Design Refinement


  • Evolved priority concepts through iterative 3D modeling and rapid-print cycles

  • Reduced required user interactions by streamlining key touchpoints

  • Refined form language to enhance intuitiveness, leveraging cues that communicate orientation and correct handling


We learned…


  • Minimizing steps in a routine isn’t just about efficiency– it directly impacts perceived effort and emotional readiness to adopt something new

testing form, grip, alignment with anatomy

SOLUTION

Our final direction positions safety, confidence, and ease as the core differentiators within a saturated category dominated by functional sameness.


To respect confidentiality agreements, this case study focuses on direction and decision-making rather than full production detail.